I'm trying to get OpenBIOS re-admitted to Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844748 http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/openbios/browser/trunk/openbios-devel
The code is a hodge-podge of files from various sources. I've attached the output of licensecheck to this email.
So the question is, do I just jam together all the known licenses into a string, ie.
License: BSD and GPLv2 and [etc]
or do we use the main license (GPLv2), or something else?
Rich.
On 08/01/2012 05:25 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm trying to get OpenBIOS re-admitted to Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844748 http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/openbios/browser/trunk/openbios-devel
The code is a hodge-podge of files from various sources. I've attached the output of licensecheck to this email.
So the question is, do I just jam together all the known licenses into a string, ie.
License: BSD and GPLv2 and [etc]
or do we use the main license (GPLv2), or something else?
There are a lot of files without per-file licensing in that mix. I'm not overly concerned about it though, since there seems to be a clear lineage from the Linux kernel, libc, and libgcc.
I think listing all the licenses in play might make sense here, although since GPLv2 is in play (and not just GPLv2+), that will almost certainly end up being the strictest license, so it could just simplify down to GPLv2.
Either way works for me.
~tom
== Fedora Project