On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 14:02 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Tuesday, 02 October 2018 at 19:02, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I'm preparing an update of gflags libgflags.so.2.1 => libgflags.so.2.2
This looks like a minor bump, not SONAME change. What does objdump -p | grep SONAME say about the two?
I got broken dependencies [1]
package glog-0.3.5-3.fc28.x86_64 requires libgflags.so.2.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both gflags-2.1.2-6.fc28.x86_64 and gflags-2.2.1- 1.fc28.x86_64 - package glog-devel-0.3.5-3.fc28.x86_64 requires libglog.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gflags-devel-2.2.1-1.fc28.x86_64 requires libgflags.so.2.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
[1] https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/opencv/fedora- 28-x86_64/00805001-ceres-solver/root.log.gz
Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelin es List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@li sts.fedoraproject.org