On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 14:02 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
On Tuesday, 02 October 2018 at 19:02, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I'm preparing an update of gflags
> libgflags.so.2.1 => libgflags.so.2.2
This looks like a minor bump, not SONAME change. What does
objdump -p | grep SONAME
say about the two?
I got broken dependencies [1]
package glog-0.3.5-3.fc28.x86_64 requires
libgflags.so.2.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both gflags-2.1.2-6.fc28.x86_64 and gflags-2.2.1-
1.fc28.x86_64
- package glog-devel-0.3.5-3.fc28.x86_64 requires
libglog.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gflags-devel-2.2.1-1.fc28.x86_64 requires
libgflags.so.2.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
[1]
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/opencv/fedora-
28-x86_64/00805001-ceres-solver/root.log.gz
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora
https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion
http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess
Irulan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelin
es
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@li
sts.fedoraproject.org --
Sérgio M. B.