Dear All,
I'm planning to submit a new bioinformatics package, io_lib, for review shortly, and am unsure what is the proper license name. I thought BSD-like summed it up pretty well, but rpmlint does not agree. Here is the license in full: === 8< === All files within the io_lib subdirectories should contain the following notice:
/* * Copyright (c) Medical Research Council 1994. All rights reserved. * * Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute this software and its * documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that * this copyright and notice appears in all copies. * * This file was written by James Bonfield, Simon Dear, Rodger Staden, * as part of the Staden Package at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular * Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QH, United Kingdom. * * MRC disclaims all warranties with regard to this software. */ === 8< ===
The package itself is hosted on SF here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/staden/io_lib-1.11.0.tar.gz
Any advice ?
Thanks, Christian
P.S. - Anyone interested to review and/or co-maintain is welcome to ping me. - I find the package name a bit disturbing... - this package builds some tools and a static library. There is no shared version, and I don't have time to hammer one out, but if someone feels inclined to provide patches I'll gladly take them and try to funnel them upstream.
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 23:19 +0200, Christian Iseli wrote:
/*
- Copyright (c) Medical Research Council 1994. All rights reserved.
- Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute this software and
its
- documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee,
provided that
- this copyright and notice appears in all copies.
- This file was written by James Bonfield, Simon Dear, Rodger Staden,
- as part of the Staden Package at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular
- Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QH, United Kingdom.
- MRC disclaims all warranties with regard to this software.
*/
Yet another MIT variant, use "License: MIT".
Nothing is "BSD-ish". :)
~spot
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 23:33 +0200, Christian Iseli wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:27:06 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
Yet another MIT variant, use "License: MIT".
k.
Thanks spot, that was quick :)
Hey, the easy ones make my day.
Although, if you want to make sure that I actually see any legal/license questions, please send them to fedora-legal-list@redhat.com in the future.
~spot
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:39:22 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
Hey, the easy ones make my day.
:-) glad I could be of help there...
Although, if you want to make sure that I actually see any legal/license questions, please send them to fedora-legal-list@redhat.com in the future.
I'll do my best.
Cheers, C