Hey,
since i use Gnome in fedora i really HATE it that the thumbnails are always oversized!!! they are giant compared to the icons and this patch solves this problem.
You need to edit this file: libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-factory.h
find this line: #define NAUTILUS_ICON_SIZE_THUMBNAIL 96
change the value of it ("96" in this case) to: "48" than it`s in sync with the standard icon size. result should be: #define NAUTILUS_ICON_SIZE_THUMBNAIL 48
i also edited this: #define NAUTILUS_ICON_MAXIMUM_SIZE 320
into this: #define NAUTILUS_ICON_MAXIMUM_SIZE 150
i don`t think this is a good patch. better would be to have this in the nautilus preferences window but i don`t know how to do that.. so i can`t adjust it that far. this will do fine.
this patch can be done in a patch thing in the nautilus rpm package
i hope this makes it`s way into the nautilus package by default.. otherwise i need to patch it manually all the time ^_-
please let me know what you think of it.
i will put it on there list. thanx.
but while this is not added to gnome.. fedora could add it in the rpm :)
Mark.
2007/3/21, Matthias Clasen mclasen@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 13:54 +0100, Mark wrote:
i hope this makes it`s way into the nautilus package by default.. otherwise i need to patch it manually all the time ^_-
Please propose this change upstream (nautilus-list@gnome.org or bugzilla.gnome.org).
Matthias
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 14:38 +0100, Mark wrote:
i will put it on there list. thanx.
but while this is not added to gnome.. fedora could add it in the rpm :)
No. It's a change that belongs upstream and Fedora truly believes in fixing things in the proper place. If it was an outright bug, maybe. But this is an enhancement request.
josh
i`ve posted it here now: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2007-March/msg00055.html
together with another small request of my own: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2007-March/msg00056.html
btw.. does a tweaking utility exists for nautilus besides gconf? because that would certainly be welcome for nautilus.
Mark.
2007/3/21, Josh Boyer jwboyer@jdub.homelinux.org:
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 14:38 +0100, Mark wrote:
i will put it on there list. thanx.
but while this is not added to gnome.. fedora could add it in the rpm :)
No. It's a change that belongs upstream and Fedora truly believes in fixing things in the proper place. If it was an outright bug, maybe. But this is an enhancement request.
josh
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list