On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker ndbecker2@gmail.com wrote:
acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users
Why? We already do that on fedora so nothing will change. (Right now we have a symlink from python2 -> python and not the other way around like in the pep, but the result for a user is the same.)
Greetings, Tom
Thomas Spura wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker ndbecker2@gmail.com wrote:
acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users
Why? We already do that on fedora so nothing will change. (Right now we have a symlink from python2 -> python and not the other way around like in the pep, but the result for a user is the same.)
Greetings, Tom
Thanks, I hadn't noticed we already have implemented python2 symlink.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Neal Becker ndbecker2@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas Spura wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker ndbecker2@gmail.com wrote:
acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users
Why? We already do that on fedora so nothing will change. (Right now we have a symlink from python2 -> python and not the other way around like in the pep, but the result for a user is the same.)
Thanks, I hadn't noticed we already have implemented python2 symlink.
Good :) I just had the feeling you mean Fedora is a "bleeding edge disto" ;)
-Tom
-
Neal Becker -
Thomas Spura