First (very) rough draft stab at a package manifest: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFedoraKDE/PackageList
Now, I'll go see if it actually works. (:
-- Rex
On 2/15/07, Rex Dieter wrote:
First (very) rough draft stab at a package manifest: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFedoraKDE/PackageList
Now, I'll go see if it actually works. (:
I'm just curious about some packages: 1) *-extras 2) yum-updatesd (does it already support a notification on kde for updates ) ? 3) kdegraphics-extras and gwenview sounds be providing extras image viewers, why do we need more that two image viewer ? 4) compiz - it requires many gnome dependencies such as gnome-session: - unanswered RFE (easy fix): - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212987 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212239 - desktop-effects kmenu entry
I still don't see why beryl isn't among the kde spin default packages. At least it has some features towards kde which compiz doesnt have. If compiz is going in anyway, that would require lots of work in that perspective.
Chitlesh
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 19:00 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
- yum-updatesd (does it already support a notification on kde for updates ) ?
yum-updatesd just does a dbus notification that anything could listen for. puplet not working with KDE is due to a bug with GtkStatusIcon[1]
Jeremy
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214222
On 2/15/07, Jeremy Katz katzj@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 19:00 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
- yum-updatesd (does it already support a notification on kde for updates ) ?
yum-updatesd just does a dbus notification that anything could listen for. puplet not working with KDE is due to a bug with GtkStatusIcon[1]
Jeremy
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214222
Well I've never seen pup yet myself, and I didn't not install it.
So if the program doesn't (yet?) work with KDE, and yumupdatesd seems to cause more than its fair share of issues, right put it in the KDE spin right now?
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 2/15/07, Rex Dieter wrote:
First (very) rough draft stab at a package manifest: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFedoraKDE/PackageList
Now, I'll go see if it actually works. (:
I'm just curious about some packages:
- *-extras
about?
- yum-updatesd (does it support a notification on kde for updates)
jeremy chimed in on that.
- kdegraphics-extras and gwenview sounds be providing extras image
viewers, why do we need more that two image viewer ?
These are what are on the media, not necessarily installed by default. (:
I still don't see why beryl isn't among the kde spin default packages.
Good point, I forgot about that.
-- Rex
The 1 or 2 DVD everything spin mentioned in other thread - will it include KDE - or if not will there be an everything kde dvd?
g/
On Thursday 15 February 2007 20:20, Mail List wrote:
The 1 or 2 DVD everything spin mentioned in other thread - will it include KDE - or if not will there be an everything kde dvd?
See, it is questions like this that make me smile. "Will an EVERYTHING set include KDE?" Its EVERYTHING, literally a manifest of "*". See what happens if you do 'yum install *'
Rex Dieter <rdieter <at> math.unl.edu> writes:
First (very) rough draft stab at a package manifest: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFedoraKDE/PackageList
What about adding kde*-devel (at least kdelibs-devel)? The GNOME-based spin is adding development stuff (as well as server stuff, but I don't think we want that on the KDE spin, do we?) now.
Kevin Kofler
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rex Dieter <rdieter <at> math.unl.edu> writes:
First (very) rough draft stab at a package manifest: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFedoraKDE/PackageList
What about adding kde*-devel
Good spot, will do. (As a matter of fact, we currently don't include any of *-devel).
-- Rex
Hello, Well I see no progress since our last IRC meeting, So I made a brief "easy" list of items which we can do before the next meeting: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ChitleshGoorah/kde
Any one want to take over any items listed ? Comments, suggestions ??
The "Extras extras splits" section entails further extras packages which I'm proposing to move to the kdeutils-extras package. What do you think, is it worth ? I can do it myself since, I already split the recommended apps (from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFedoraKDE).
see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148301
And, It don't know where to send my proposed split spec file, I've chosen their respective review request, though kdeutils has already been approved. Any one has a better solution ?? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194375
Chitlesh
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
Hello, Well I see no progress since our last IRC meeting, So I made a brief "easy" list of items which we can do before the next meeting: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ChitleshGoorah/kde
Feel free to modify FeatureFedoraKDE and/or make pages under that.
The "Extras extras splits" section entails further extras packages which I'm proposing to move to the kdeutils-extras package. What do you think, is it worth ? I can do it myself since, I already split the recommended apps (from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFedoraKDE).
I suspect we'll have a much better of idea after this weeks' meeting, where Than (and Florian) will (hopefully) attend.
-- Rex
-
Arthur Pemberton -
Chitlesh GOORAH -
Genes MailLists -
Jeremy Katz -
Jesse Keating -
Kevin Kofler -
Rex Dieter