October 2020 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201012.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201011.0): ID: 691368 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691368 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

3 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2020-10-12 Fedora QA Meeting

by Adam Williamson

Hi folks! Apologies for the late notice, but I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for tomorrow. We met last week and I don't have much for the agenda, and also it's a public holiday here in Canada. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedorap...

3 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora Account System and Bugzilla Mismatch

by Sergio Belkin

Hi, I've changed my mail address of FAS because my old one does not exist anymore. So I've received a mail telling me that "Fedora Account System and Bugzilla Mismatch" Sadly, I forget my bugzilla password, and so if I login using FAS, it tells me: "Would you like to create an account for... (new address mail)" ? I'm afraid that doing so, because I wouldn't want to lost my earlier activity, how can I recover my bugzilla password in order to change my mail address in bugzilla. Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org

3 years, 6 months

2
2
0 / 0

Packager Dashboard out of sync? - https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org

by Felix Schwarz

Hi, it seems that the packager dashboard does not synchronize my data anymore: https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org/fschwarz For example it still shows bug #1874669 ("Please build python-cssselect2 for EPEL8") as NEW even though that bug is closed since 2020-09-19. Also a lot of new bugs are not displayed at all. Where can I report these issues? Is that a known bug? Felix

3 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

RPM review: jack-mixer

by Erich Eickmeyer

Hi all, I've brought-over another package from Ubuntu, this time it's Jack Mixer. This is an excellent program that provides a simple mixer that works with MIDI and allows for plugins to be patched-in using Carla. This is a great alternative to having a full-fledged DAW running while trying to do live audio, as would be my use case. Either way, here's the BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887091 Would really appreciate a review on this, and would even do a review swap if your package is simple enough for my little brain. :) Best regards, Erich -- Erich Eickmeyer Maintainer Fedora Jam

3 years, 6 months

2
3
0 / 0

[Test-Announce] 2020-10-12 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 33 Blocker Review Meeting

by Adam Williamson

# F33 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2020-10-12 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 1 proposed Final blocker and 2 proposed Final freeze exceptions to review (as of now), so we'll have a Fedora 33 blocker review meeting on Monday. If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ . Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! For the Fedora 33 cycle we enabled a new voting system and have been using it pretty heavily. If you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you'll see links labeled "Vote!" next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions. Those links take you to tickets where you can vote. https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review has instructions on how exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs where there wasn't a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F33 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Have a good day and see you tomorrow! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedorap...

3 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

fawkes

by Kevin Fenzi

Hey folks. The fawkes package FTBFS and is not installable in F33/rawhide. This breaks the robotics spin compose, and since it's the _last_ failing thing in f33 composes, I'd love to fix it. :) We don't have a listed post of contact for the robotics spin. :( If we did perhaps we could just remove fawkes for now and fix it that way? Or is it too essential to the spin? I don't know. ;( So, I went part way down the rabbit hole, and I wonder if someone else can figure out the rest. First we need: https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/fawkesrobotics/fawkes/pull/2... to fix the boost placeholder change in the recent boost update. Then, https://github.com/fawkesrobotics/fawkes/compare/tviehmann/microhttpd-tem... gets it past the updated microhttpd that we have. But then it hits: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=53038092 ... [PLUGIN] src/plugins/clips-navgraph/: plugins/clips-navgraph <-- Leaving src/plugins/gazebo/msgs In file included from /usr/include/ignition/msgs1/ignition/msgs/header.pb.h:35, from /usr/include/ignition/msgs1/ignition/msgs/color.pb.h:35, from /usr/include/gazebo-10/gazebo/msgs/msgs.hh:32, from /usr/include/gazebo-10/gazebo/transport/TopicManager.hh:30, from /usr/include/gazebo-10/gazebo/transport/Node.hh:32, from /builddir/build/BUILD/fawkes-1.3.0/src/plugins/gazebo/aspect/gazebo.h:30, from /builddir/build/BUILD/fawkes-1.3.0/src/plugins/gazebo/aspect/gazebo_inifin.h:28, from /builddir/build/BUILD/fawkes-1.3.0/src/plugins/gazebo/aspect/gazebo_inifin.cpp:25: /usr/include/ignition/msgs1/ignition/msgs/time.pb.h:56:51: error: 'AuxiliaryParseTableField' in namespace 'google::protobuf::internal' does not name a type; did you mean 'AuxillaryParseTableField'? 56 | static const ::PROTOBUF_NAMESPACE_ID::internal::AuxiliaryParseTableField aux[] | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | AuxillaryParseTableField ... I think this might be that we need a newer ignition-msgs package? Or something in gazebo? Ideas welcome. ;) kevin

3 years, 6 months

4
9
0 / 0

Preferred way to ask for package update

by Kai A. Hiller

Hello, what ways are there to let other maintainers know that I need them to update a package? What is the preferred way to do it? Some ways that came to my mind are: * PR with the required changes to their package * Blocking on the release monitoring bugzilla bug * Opening a new bug against their package * Mailing them I am asking because I tried those unsuccessfully, but wanted to make sure I did my part before bothering someone with the unresponsive maintainer procedure. Best wishes Kai

3 years, 6 months

2
2
0 / 0

Fedora-33-20201011.n.0 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201010.n.0): ID: 691002 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691002 ID: 691035 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691035 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20201010.n.0): ID: 691021 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691021 Soft failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-33-20201010.n.0): ID: 690946 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690946 ID: 690965 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690965 ID: 690992 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690992 ID: 691005 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691005 ID: 691025 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691025 ID: 691028 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691028 ID: 691042 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691042 ID: 691054 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691054 ID: 691076 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691076 ID: 691079 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691079 Passed openQA tests: 168/181 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: System load changed from 0.10 to 0.25 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690406#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690944#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload: Used swap changed from 29 MiB to 56 MiB System load changed from 2.23 to 0.80 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690451#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690989#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi: Used swap changed from 44 MiB to 63 MiB System load changed from 0.66 to 0.48 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690453#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690991#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 1.24 to 0.98 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690471#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691009#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: Used swap changed from 24 MiB to 29 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690487#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691025#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: Used swap changed from 20 MiB to 28 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690490#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691028#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde: System load changed from 1.23 to 1.59 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690531#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691069#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal: System load changed from 0.07 to 0.18 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690578#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/691116#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

3 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201011.n.0 changes

by Fedora Rawhide Report

OLD: Fedora-33-20201010.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20201011.n.0 ===== SUMMARY ===== Added images: 0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages: 0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages: 0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B ===== ADDED IMAGES ===== ===== DROPPED IMAGES ===== ===== ADDED PACKAGES ===== ===== DROPPED PACKAGES ===== ===== UPGRADED PACKAGES ===== ===== DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =====

3 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel October 2020