Looking for someone to review the following python package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839242
It's not complicated by any means.
I'll be glad to review another package in return. Thank you.
I just built version 0.13.0 of ocaml-bin-prot for Rawhide and Fedora
32. The license has changed from "LGPLv2+ with exceptions" to "MIT
and BSD".
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
We autogenerate RPM Requires/Provides in a few projects, and it's
quite nice. eg: supermin-devel has:
$ rpm -ql supermin-devel
/usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/supermin.attr
/usr/lib/rpm/supermin-find-requires
and this means other packages that contain supermin appliances can
simply put their appliance in a particular directory matching the name
"*/supermin.d/packages/" and (since they have to BuildRequire
supermin-devel anyway) RPM will create the correct dependencies
automatically.
Great! But ...
I'd like to use it to autogenerate nbdkit plugin Provides, where the
presence of a file named something like %{_libdir}/nbdkit/plugins/*.so
should generate a Provides with the plugin name, eg:
$ rpm -qf --provides /usr/lib64/nbdkit/plugins/nbdkit-curl-plugin.so
nbdkit-curl-plugin = 1.21.7-1.fc33
Right now we list them explicitly:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nbdkit/blob/master/f/nbdkit.spec#_161
The problem is all the current plugins exist in nbdkit itself. nbdkit
is not a BuildRequire of nbdkit, so it cannot provide RPM rules for
itself. Doing so would create a nasty circular dependency that makes
bootstrapping awkward.
I could create a subpackage with the RPM rules, which is still a
circular dependency but at least the subpackage would be noarch and
wouldn't depend on anything else.
This is getting complicated - is there some easier thing I'm missing here?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org
Hi everybody!
We were discussing getting CCs for bugs of components which you no
longer maintain over in #fedora-admin, and I figured that Pagure should
be able to tell me what components I'm watching, just in case I wanted
to remove myself preemptively, before my inbox gets clogged up.
Turns out that the "Pagure Watch List" was news to other people, too,
so here are the links in case you missed the memo, too! ;)
- Dist Git: https://src.fedoraproject.org/dashboard/watchlist
- Pagure.io: https://pagure.io/dashboard/watchlist
Ciao,
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to
Software Engineer purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither
Red Hat Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: D0C1 1576 CDA6 5B6E BBAE 95B2 7D53 7FCA E9F6 395D
old: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
Hey everyone ,
I recently downloaded the fedora kde spin and noticed there were some
differences among the apps that came with it . On the site [1] the web
browser that comes with the spin is told to be konqueror , but firefox and
falkon are included in the spin instead . I think there were other apps
that are shown on the site but are not there in the spin .
I request that the web page be changed/updated to display the correct set
of apps .
Should I be filing a bug for this ?
[1]-https://spins.fedoraproject.org/kde/
Thanks ,
Harsh
I'm trying to install gmic on my Fedora 32 system, which requries opencv,
which requires protobuf 3.11
DNF refuses to install any of them though, because protobuf 3.11 is blocked
by modularity:
- package protobuf-3.11.2-2.fc32.i686 is filtered out by modular filtering
- package protobuf-3.11.2-2.fc32.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering
All I can see with "dnf list" is a seriously outdated version from an unknown
module:
protobuf.x86_64 3.6.1-6.module_f32+6163+c0e6dcb2 fedora-modular
protobuf.x86_64 3.6.1-6.module_f32+6163+c0e6dcb2 updates-modular
What is the right way to fix this ? dnf module list shows me loads of
modules, but I'm not seing how to determine which of them are enabled vs
disabled, and more importantly which is providing this bogus outdated
protobuf ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Hello,
I've just orphaned wt <https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wt> package in
fedora.
It now fails to install in Fedora 33
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843151> and I have no longer
free cycles to maintain it.
I'll be happy to assist if anybody is interested to take over.
Best regards,
Michal
--
Michal Minář
SENIOR SOFTWARE ON-SITE ENGINEER @ SAP LINUXLAB
Red Hat GmbH <http://www.de.redhat.com/>, Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill, Thomas
Savage
miminar(a)redhat.com
M: +49-173-592- <+49-179-531-3672>2662 IM: miminar Telegram:
@miminarht <https://t.me/miminarht>
<https://www.redhat.com/>
Hi all,
I'm updating librealsense to 2.35.2 in Rawhide. The only dependency is
fawkes, which is currently FTBFS because gazebo fails to install.
Kind regards,
Till