Jud Craft wrote:
I'm not sure I understand. How can LLVM-C be ABI-incompatible
with plain
GCC-C?
It's the ABI of:
llvm-g++ → LLVM → LLVM C backend → gcc
or:
Clang (C++) → LLVM → LLVM C backend → gcc
which is incompatible with the ABI of plain g++.
AFAICT, the native LLVM backends don't have that problem. The real problem
with C++ is that Clang's C++ support is experimental and incomplete, so
you're stuck with llvm-g++.
I thought that C doesn't have any crazy name or symbol or
virtual
table mangling. The stuff should just work, right?
But this is about C++.
Kevin Kofler