On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:08:04AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Right. Tooling should stop that too. And I'm not just
talking
> _completely_ in hand-wavy theory. This is Dennis Gilmore's plan, where
> any package build which breaks other packages (or possibly other
> integration testing) gets automatically shuttled to a temporary side
> repo.
I think I asked this question before, but I don't remember the answer.
Will Dennis's work include some way of letting high priority packages
break low priority packages? As an example, I maintain the polymake
It's a good question. :) I don't know the answer, but it does make
sense to me that we have something like this.
Either way, we should let polymake break and let me fix it as soon
as
I can. Perl updates should not be delayed. Will that be possible?
Maybe polymake should be in its own repository with a version of perl
that it's known to work with.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader