Not a developer nor do I know the inner workings of rpm-ostree but...
After doing yet another reinstall of Fedora Silverblue 30 I can confirm
that nvidia-settings *is* installed by doing:
rpm-ostree install akmod-nvidia xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
Which it is supposed to. However, doing:
rpm-ostree install nvidia-settings
results in the package being installed with the output of:
https://pastebin.com/hE4BeNfi ...despite nvidia-settings already being
installed and usable.
In other words, packages weren't added but 1.9 GB was added to the
image(which was fast since this is a 5400RPM drive and it took like 2
minutes...). OK, so what happens if you try installing it again? It gives
an error: error: Package/capability 'nvidia-settings' is already requested
...and if you try removing it after it's been layered you get:
https://pastebin.com/6BGxZCz9
Again, it removed nothing but freed 79 MB of space. The output doesn't make
a whole lot of sense...
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:07 PM Samuel Sieb <samuel(a)sieb.net> wrote:
On 7/8/19 11:46 PM, Ty Young wrote:
> rpm-ostree install akmod-nvidia xorg-x11-drv-nvidia = core working driver
> rpm-ostree install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs = OpenGL/Vulkan
> rpm-ostree install nvidia-settings = explicitly installed nvidia-settings
> rpm-ostree install nvidia-xconfig = x config utility for Nvidia
> rpm-ostree install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda
> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda-libs = nvidia-smi
Does rpm-ostree use dnf? Does it handle rich dependencies the same way?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org