On 6/27/22 04:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Re variant 2: the proposal limited to brige/bond devices seems much more
reasonable. In particular, the case described below of a server (virtualized
or not) in a big datacenter is the one case where the benefits of
MACAddressPolicy=none are clearly visible. I still don't think it's worth
changing the default, but here the cost:benefit ratio is much closer.
I think that's reasonable. The proposal owners are willing to make this change
to the proposal so that it only applies to bond/bridge/team devices if that
is more acceptable.