On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 16:15, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/
No dates set yet, but a driving goal or defining characteristic will
be the 2.6 Linux kernel -- unless the 2.6 Linux kernel takes too
long to arrive. That is, we'll shorten the schedule to accomodate an
earlier release of the 2.6 kernel, but not lengthen it to accomodate
a later release of the 2.6 kernel.
2.6 is looking good. There's a lot of integration work to do, though.
However, that won't be the ONLY feature of Fedora Core 2. I'd like to
hear people's wishlists. Not everything will be possible, but it would
be nice to have a good list from which to pick the possibilities, and
from which to also pick ideas later for Fedora Core 3.
Update from upstream if update is available. ImageMagick comes to mind
and IIRC there are other packages where we don't ship the latest stable
(according to upstream) version. If we can't ship it, it should be
documented why we can't (to both the community and upstream).
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp(a)redhat.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011