On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2016 11:22:30 -0500
Adam Miller <maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Collection of RPMs is fine, the goal is just not to ship non-rpm code
> or content yet outside of Docker-ized application control scripts
> where needed/applicable.
ok.
>
> It shouldn't but it can in the future, I was more or less replicating
> this information in the beginning to hopefully leave some space for
> this to change in the future of the Fedora Modularization efforts
> because a module could potentially have it's own versioning scheme
> outside of the content inside of it.
Has it been decided that modules are docker containers?
No. AIUI, a docker container is one potential delivery artifact for a
module. There are others, such as RPM repos. So it is not a strict
"modules are containers" mapping.
josh