On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:28:45 +0000 (GMT), Mark J Cox <mjc(a)redhat.com> wrote:
What would be incredibly useful is to move (to being a Provides) the
CVE
names for issues that we're including a backported fix for. Where we've
moved to an upstream version that contains fixes those CVE names are less
important as they can be deduced by a simple NV check.
I look forward to building pathological packages that have a requires
on a CVE name provides.
-jef