Josh Boyer wrote on 12.06.2015 13:55:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Neal Gompa
<ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
As I said, there are no great solutions here.
A "works most of the time"-solution would be: Install kernel-devel by
default. But I'm not seriously suggesting that, because I fully agree:
It's not a great solution.
Did anyone(¹) look at soft dependencies in rpm? Can they make our
tools install the kernel-devel packages in the variants that match the
kernel variants installed? I suspect they are made to solve problems
like this, but I'm not sure; and I don't know how far soft dependencies
are supported in out current stack of packaging tools.
CU
knurd
(¹) no, I'm not looking at you Josh