> > so what's the point? Yum's changelog plugin is
> > much more useful than this proposal will ever be.
>
> Actually, that's my fallback when no infos are provided in PK.
>
> But that doesn't take away the fact that having infos in PK would be
> really nice :)
Sure, file a bug. I didn't know we could get the ChangeLog comments from
yum. There's already support for it in the PK API.
No, I was talking about the infos about the update, the ones the
discussion is about, not the rpm changelog !
As said previously, it doesn't necessarily make sense (depending on
who is speaking) to have the rpm changelog displayed as the
information update in PK.
----------
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador
----------
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin