Re: Quick C++ question for C++ experts :)
On 02/04/15 10:34 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
Thanks. Hadn't occurred to me the + operator here was a template
as
I'd never had to deal with basic_string. Still a bit puzzled as
cplusplus.com says string is an instantiation of basic_string while
cppreference.com says it's a typedef (which I guess doesn't count as
explicit instantiation).
cplusplus.com is notoriously inaccurate. It probably means string is a
specialization of basic_string.
This is going very off-topic for this list.