Hi,
I've just noticed that there are not separate packages for private headers of Qt 5 in
Fedora but there is one for Qt 4. Also I've checked specs of some packages like
qt5-qtdeclarative which uses private headers during the compilation and their rpms depends
on qt5-qtbase >= ${qt5_version} instead of qt5-qtbase == ${qt5_version} which may be
source of various errors (because Qt doesn't guarantee API/ABI compatibility for
private headers).
Is it made on purpose and how does Fedora guarantee that nothing breaks in case of
Qt's minor/patch updates?
--
Ruslan Nigmatullin