On Jeu 23 juin 2005 09:30, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 08:46 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Some type of "journalling RAID" would be a possible solution (and
> would also allow for much faster re-syncs on unclean shutdown, as only
> the last written blocks would need updating).
This is why RAID is entirely the wrong answer, and redundancy should be
implemented in the file system itself, instead of being hacked into the
block layer.
Can't this be done today with something that takes lvm snapshots each night ?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot