On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 23:45, Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Russell Coker (russell(a)coker.com.au) said:
> > While creating a new problem for finding pid files... do you go
> > by the service name? The server name? Something else?
>
> How would the problem be any greater than it is right now?
Right now it's basename of the process.
Except in the case of /var/run/sm-client.pid which has a process base-name of
"sendmail". I'm sure that there are other similar exceptions too.
> In terms of what
> name to use (service, server, or something else) it's exactly the same
> issue as we have at the moment with /var/run/something.pid.
If you move to this new thing, do you do one dir per daemon? One
per process? Something else?
One per security context. So have /var/run/sendmail for sendmail.pid and
sm-client.pid as they are both part of the sendmail service.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page