On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 00:57 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote:
I think some cross compilers would be a good idea. I already use arm
regularly and will shortly have a need for nesC and some AVR cross
tools. If they are candidates for extras, I don't know.
I don't really see why not.
I do now there was some discuss, which remains unresolved, as to the
naming convention to use for cross tool chain packages.
Does it matter? Far too much masturbation goes on around here.
David Woodhouse wrote:
> Stuff like crosstool makes it relatively simple, but it's still slow --
I take that back, btw -- I've been fighting crosstool for a while this
morning and I still haven't managed to build a simple ppc->i686
crosscompiler. And I don't even want glibc -- I _only_ want to build
kernels. Not that that seems to be an option.
The whole incestuous gcc/libgcc/libc thing needs to be fixed up and made
relatively sane -- but that's outside the scope of this discussion, I
suppose.
--
dwmw2