On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 07:28 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:17:55 -0400, Braden wrote:
> On 7/23/09 12:13 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:55:57 -0400, Braden wrote:
> >
> >> Is the problem that the gecko-libs dependency is not arch-specific? How
> >> do we fix that?
> >
> > You could make it arch-specific by depending on gecko-libs%{?_isa} = ...
>
> This doesn't Just Work; it seems that the provider of gecko-libs needs
> to make it arch-specific as well.
>
> I've filed bug 517665 against xulrunner and bug 517666 against
> java-1.6.0-openjdk.
Yes, the %{?_isa} Provides get automatically created (even for F11) for
physical packages,
$ rpm -q --provides gtk2|grep ^gtk
gtk2 = 2.16.5-1.fc11
gtk2(x86-32) = 2.16.5-1.fc11
but not for virtual ones. gecko-libs and gecko-devel are *still* only
virtual packages defined manually within the xulrunner.spec
So is there a reason why that must be the case?
It's been suggested (by Christopher Aillon in bug 517665) that not
automatically generating the arch-specific provides is a bug in
rpmbuild.
--
Braden McDaniel <braden(a)endoframe.com>