OpenModelica users wanting to have rpms?

Hi, if you are an OpenModelica user, you might know that we do not have any rpms available for fedora. This might be due to the buildsystem. I have started converting MetaModelica to autootols to boot-bootstrap the omc build process. See github.com/choeger/MetaModelica-autotools Building the rml compiler and the related libraries was easy, but now I could need some help and advice on how to build the testcases. In the original buildsystem from https://openmodelica.ida.liu.se/svn/MetaModelica there are some examples with own makefiles, but those refer to the buildsystem itself. I am not sure how to handle this with automake (obviously it would require to build the compiler before the tests). So currently I am wondering if the examples should have a build system that requires the compiler to be installed, any thoughts? On the other hand, there are some "style" questions, I'd like to be answered: This package builds three slightly different libraries in three differen flavors: called (librml_plain|librml_mask|librml_diff)(_g|_p|).so Those flavors only differ by the CFLAGS set upon compilation (_p means -p, _g -g). Upstream told me, they require them all, but would this be acceptable? Is the name rml ok for a library in /usr/lib or shall I use /usr/lib/rml/ by default? (Same for headers) What with the name? Is MetaModelica even a good name, if the main binary is rmlc? The package builds a compiler driver, essentially a shell script, by copying some configuration variables into a shell template (mainly how to invoke cc). Would this be fine as a /usr/bin script? Feel free to demand any changes, I will discuss this with upstream. regards Christoph