On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 09:54:22AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Do you think that this problem is as bad if we overload /
replace /
> enhance comps groups and the @ syntax? Or do we need to find a
> different character? (Uh, I guess % is sitting out there....)
Again, if my scripts are using the @ symbol, I am expecting that I am going
to get the @ syntax. As can be seen when the comps groups get broken in a
main release, there are people who rely on it for deploying the system and
expect that certain choices are 'made'. I would go with either a new symbol
or keyword.
Even if, as in my imagination, we could make modules behave as a
superset of comps groups?
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader