On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:13 PM Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 2019-11-19, John M. Harris Jr <johnmh(a)splentity.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 4:42:31 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote:
>> Manual work. Random commiters skipping them.
>
> If your goal is to make it so that "Random commiters" are packagers,
that's
> going to fall flat very quickly - as they'll just throw one version of
the
> package in, never think about it again. That is an untenable situation.
>
No. Random commiter is some one who does not know that the two
branches have to be kept in synchronization. In other words someone else
than the maintainer. E.g. If there is a guideline change or a SONAME
bump then somebody touches your package.
While not perfect, this would be an ideal use of the README file in the
master branch. This could specify things like, where to report bugs, if a
proven packager should try to contact the customary maintainer in advance,
if possible, how branches are maintained, etc.
regards,
bex
-- Petr
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Brian "bex" Exelbierd (he/him/his)
RHEL Product Management & Community Architect
@bexelbie |
http://www.winglemeyer.org
bexelbie(a)redhat.com