On 03/22/2012 02:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Exactly! Ultimately what we need is FESCo to document what are the
> > requirements of being promoted to a primary architecture and then it's
> > the ARM SIGs job of ensuring they adhere to the requirements, provide
> > viable workable alternatives that are acceptable to FESCo, or provide
> > proof that the requirement will be met within an agreed time frame.
ARM should most definitely NOT be approved as a primary architecture
before
all the requirements are actually met!
Hold on, these requirements are something you just made up to suit
your argument.
Andrew.