Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name

Jeff Spaleta wrote: I also find it much easier for new contributors to Extra to have a clear policy about this. Since more and more people are going to be contributing to Fedora, I think that we have to agree on policies. Very true, and that's what Axel's proposal to introduce a virtual Provides is trying to solve. With it, a simple "rpm --whatprovides shared-library-package" returns all the library packages. Now we need a way to actually expire the old libraries. Proposals have been made in this direction to flag what the user has directly asked for and what was brought in as a dependency. In which case the library could be garbage-collected (if nothing depends on it anymore). This would be great, but I don't know how much work it would require to implement it in rpmlib (and in wrappers maybe ? maybe not needed) Another solution would be to select those of which nothing depend and to ask the user if it has to be removed. This would be much easier to implement of course. Does this sum it up correctly ? I think that both solutions are not mutually exclusive. We could start the slow move to add virtual provides in the shared libs, and sonames in the rpm name, and write the second script. We would have something useable before rpmlib gets the "garbage-collect" feature. Did I miss some points ? Thanks Aurélien -- http://gauret.free.fr ~~~~ Jabber : gauret(a)amessage.info For external use only