On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 11:02 -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 02:45:00PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> The Fedora Engineering Steering Committee would like to remind maintainers
> that a license change in a package is a very serious event - it has as many,
> if not more, implications for related packages as ABI changes do.
>
> Therefore, if your package changes license, even if it just changes the
> license version, it is required that you announce it, whether on this list
> or fedora-devel-list.
>
> Note that any license change to a more restrictive license or license
> version may affect the legality of portions of Fedora as a whole; ergo,
> FESCo reserves the right to block upgrades of packages to versions with
> new licenses to ensure the legal distribution of Fedora.
BTW, shouldn't we start changing License: tags in packages for *GPL
packages, so that it include the exact version?
E.g. License: GPL2 (or GPL2only?) for GPL 2 without any later,
LGPL2.1+ (or LGPL2.1?) for LGPL 2.1 or any later, etc.
Not yet. FESCo is currently working on how we want to handle this.
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bpepple(a)fedoraproject.org>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple
gpg --keyserver
pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E