On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 12:21 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 9/20/11 11:43 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 11:33 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> Of course, the accounts system _still_ doesn't have groups, five years
>> later, so provenpackager is the big hammer we have. We could get groups
>> any day now, that'd be just fine.
>
> Do you mean "groups of groups", like in "provenpackager-kde",
> "provenpackager-gnome", and "provenpackager" means all of
these?
I don't see any real reason to do that instead of just unix-style
groups, but either one would be an improvement.
Hmm, it seems I don't quite get what you mean with "the accounts system
_still_ doesn't have groups" -- while provenpackager among others is a
group. Would you please elaborate?
TIA,
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils(a)redhat.com nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011