On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 10:31 -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
seth vidal <skvidal(a)linux.duke.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 14:52 +0200, Florian Festi wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > The next generation of yum can be found at
http://www.yum4.org
> > And for those who want the future right now:
http://www.yum5.org.
> >
> > If you think the content is too boring try using whois.
> >
>
> Florian,
> That is hilarious. Thanks for pointing that out.
>
> I was thinking from here on out we should just do squares for version
> number increases:
>
> yum 3 -> yum 9 -> yum 81 -> yum 6561 -> yum 43046721 -> yum
> 1853020188851841
Why not using the (La)TeX idea of an irrational number, adding a digit
each round? sqrt(11) = 3.316624... would do. So the next one would be
3.3, then 3.31, 3.316, ...
[Sadly, the "nice" numbers \pi, e, \phi are too small now...]
Use resonant frequencies of your favorite isotopes - you get the benefit
of higher version numbers and multiple choices for each release :P
Yeah, I'm just being silly, catching up on old email.
Jon.