Re: New kernel-doc only sometimes has an issue
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:45:25AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:44:05 -0500,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:34:57AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >I noticed today in rawhide that when kernel-doc isn't built for a kernel,
> >it isn't included at all. I thought the intention was to include the
> >latest kernel-doc that was built?
>
> That's not how the compose stuff works since kernel-doc is a subpackage.
>
> Bill pointed this out when the commit went into the kernel package.
Isn't that a problem though?
For whom?
The kernel-doc package isn't exactly popular. It's built once per -rc as
the amount of change day-to-day is likely very small or near zero. It's
not installed by default (or I don't think it is).
josh