On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 09:24 -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 at 9:14am, Jeremy Katz wrote
> The default is for the driver to be suspended normally; SUSPEND_MODULES
> is to list (broken) modules that have to be removed and reinserted
> around the suspend process.
Is it considered a (fixable, bugzillable) bug if normal suspending works
but has undesirable effects? Example -- on my Thinkpad Z61t, suspend and
wake-up worked out of the box with FC6, but the power drain was impressive
(I have the figures at home, but it was >50% battery of capacity
overnight). Some experimenting demonstarted that removing the USB modules
before going to sleep dropped the sleeping power consumption considerably,
so I put those in SUSPEND_MODULES. I figured this was model specific so I
didn't bugzilla it. Should I?
It definitely doesn't hurt to file it so that it can be tracked. And
should probably be filed against kernel
Jeremy