On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:40:05 +0000
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
At the moment mkinitrd goes through a big hoo-hah where it tries to
determine what precise set of kernel modules are needed to mount the
root filesystem, and no more.
But I don't understand why we don't just put every possible block
device driver / LVM / crypto module / etc. into the initrd. The
ramdisk is discarded as soon as the root filesystem is mounted, so at
most we're saving a few kilobytes of disk space. At the same time,
mkinitrd is massively more complicated than it really needs to be, and
initrd images are non-portable between machines[*].
unpacking the initrd in the kernel takes real time. Easily a second
for a "really big" initrd as you're proposing...
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit
http://www.lesswatts.org