On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:52 PM Dan Book <grinnz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As an outsider to the Python community, not having any binary or package that responds to
the expected name "python" would be a disaster.
Can you expand on that? As I understand it, most things that are
calling for "python" now are expecting that to be "python2". So when
it becomes "python3", they'll break anyway. So why perpetuate a
pattern that's not future-proof (for some values of "proof")?
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis