On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:43 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 7/18/22 06:33, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> I have filed multiple bugs against llvm (or rust, which were then
> reassigned to llvm) and llvm compat packages over the past 1-2 years,
> and they've been pretty much ignored.
Can you send me links to these bugs.
The current ones are (some rust bugs are already reassigned to llvm,
some weren't yet, but probably should be):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001328
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020861
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041942
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045116
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086106
There have been previous ones for F34 that were closed at EOL without
resolution:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020861
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883457
And these are only the ones I could find quickly, I'm pretty sure
there are a few more.
> Also, given that rawhide *is* up-to-date with LLVM bugfix
releases
> until about three weeks ago, but the llvm packages on f36 and f35
> weren't touched since 4 months (f36) and f35 (9 months) ago,
> respectively, so I don't think PTO can be a problem here.
> Or, if it is, then we'd need to have a serious talk about adding
> backup maintainers to those packages ...
>
We've been training up more people on LLVM packaging so we should be able
to cover the stable release of Fedora better in the future. I'm sorry
that the stable releases have been falling behind, we'll work on getting them
back up to date.
That sounds great, thank you for trying to improve the situation.
Fabio