On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 09:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Vít Ondruch
<vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> * 896 - Refine Feature Process (notting, 18:07:50)
>> * AGREED: Feature process modification: features are announced on
>> devel-announce by feature wrangler once wrangler verifies feature
>> page content (+:9, -:0) (notting, 18:34:51)
>
>
> Well done! Thank you.
>
>
>> * AGREED: FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week after the
>> devel-announce announcement. (+:8, -:0, 0:0) (notting, 18:46:03)
>
>
> Now the rest of the change: "The feature is automatically accepted (no FESCo
> involved at all) after one week if there is no negative feedback on ML.
> Otherwise it must be evaluated by FESCo."
At the least, that should be rephrased. Negative feedback isn't the
thing you really want to trigger off of. It's more "if there is no
significant discussion" or something similar. You can have something
with a lot of positive discussion that is still a large and invasive
Feature that should be reviewed by FESCo.
Let's rephrase it:
The feature is automatically accepted (no FESCo involved at all) after
one week if the submitter of feature or anybody else explicitly does not
ask for FESCo review and approval.
Also, there was dissent already in the "auto-approving" of
leaf-features
during the meeting discussion so I am not sure that auto-accepting of
Features in general given a lack of response is ever going to actually
happen. I personally wouldn't vote for it.
I still hope that some kind of auto-accepting of features will be
approved by FESCo. I personally would vote for it if it is reasonably
worded.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb