Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Yuck (again), my simple-minded non-lawyer common sense tells me
such
> items shouldn't be using the GPL then, but that's just me.
The Red Hat logos are not under GPL. The package license of the two
relevant packages and the EULA makes this clear.
Thanks, though I'd argue mixing-n-matching licenses within a (single)
package is bad form.
-- Rex