El vie, 10-11-2017 a las 09:12 -0500, Neal Gompa escribió:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each
> > > Fedora
> > > version and changes slowly, and it also contains the preset
> > > files for
> > > systemd units, which change fairly often (a few requests per
> > > month).
> >
> > Why not have a separate fedora-presets then? Just like fedora-
> > repos was
> > split out from fedora-release several releases ago.
>
> Well, pfff, no particular reason, at least from my side. Just
> opening
> a new package and going through the (trivial) review, etc., is a
> bit
> of up-front effort, and then releasing updates for two packages is
> always a bit more effort then for one. So instead, I'd want a good
> reason
> to make another package and how that is going to solve something.
> So far I
> haven't seen anything except some hypothetical issues.
This would allow us to deduplicate the presets shipped in
generic-release and fedora-release, wouldn't it?
We do not keep them in sync between fedora-release and generic-release
this is because generic-release is there just to provide an example of
how you would setup a -release package for a custom forked OS. it is
not intended to be a complete drop in for fedora-release.
Dennis
And as long has it has a "system-presets" Provides,
downstream folks
can swap them easily enough.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org