On Fri, 02.05.14 10:53, Stephen Gallagher (sgallagh(a)redhat.com) wrote:
> He also writes "particularly since it appears to have been
> developed without the input of the journald creators". The code in
> question has been reviewed on the systemd mailing list, and
> discussed internally. Also, although I didn't have anything to do
> with initial journald creation, I have been one the people handling
> bugs and adding features to it over the last two years.
This was an impression I got from the discussion thread up to that
point. I didn't get a sense that the core journald developers were in
agreement with this as the approach (and as noted above, it appeared
that this was being pushed as the One True Way to do this).
Wut?
I think Zibigniew and I are actually very much on the same
page. Zbigniew is a systemd commiter, I trust him, and I think it's good
stuff he is doing. We have discussed the protocol choices many times
within the systemd community and we are all behind this approach.
I am pretty sure HTTP(s) is the right choice, and that we cover both push
and pull models, and Zbigniew's brings us a good step closer to that
goal, even if it might not bring us all the way there yet.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat