On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:45:12 +0100
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:17:43 -0800, Adam wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 20:18 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > Three times "Could". Let's talk about it when you know something
> > definite, please, but before it will become another hurdle.
>
> That's ironic - given that that's exactly what the people defending
> this proposal wanted to do, while it's someone who's opposed to the
> proposal who decided to start a premature argument about it.
Then let's see this thread as the updates-testing push of a proposal
FESCo might have given its blessing to, if this thread had not been
started.
Except it's more like a scratch build that someone built quickly, then
decided that a more detailed approach was needed, so they didn't even
submit an update. ;)
kevin