On 13/02/19 14:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Isn't the assembler syntax different or does gas now support
the nasm syntax (and macros plus a bunch of other stuff AIUI)?
If we require gas then I assume a whole bunch of asm would have
to be rewritten ...
Indeed, for example edk2 used to have separate source files for masm and
gas (yuck) and has standardized on nasm a few years ago. If binutils
can support nasm syntax, I'd be happy to use it of course.
Paolo