Re: xscale port of fedora core 2
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:42:23PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:01:21AM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> >Yeah. There are lots of strange things to be found in userland. Like
> >openssl assuming that linux-elf == i386, for example.
> >
> >OK, so how do I go from here? Should I just submit all my patches to
> >bugzilla and wait?
>
> - File against each component in product "Fedora Core".
OK, my binutils patch just got rejected because "Fedora Core 2 isn't
ported to the ARM."
If you have FC2 based port, please keep the patch local to the ARM port
(say have binutils-2.15.90.0.3-5xscale.src.rpm instead of what was shipped
in FC2 - e.g. Fedora Core SPARC port does the same).
I don't think it is a good idea to issue FC2 updates just because there
was an ARM patch added, FC2 users on i386/x86-64 would IMHO definitely
not appreciate having to download the updates with zero changes.
binutils in FC3 will be 2.15.91.0.2 (~end of July '04) or later, so the
patch in question is definitely there for FC3.
Jakub