----- Original Message -----
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda <
bkabrda(a)redhat.com
> wrote:
> Yes, Ralf says how a sentence from FHS "is meant to be
> interpreted".
> I'm giving you a clear statement, that distributions may install
> software into /opt. Is the interpretation that Ralf is mentioning
> an
> official interpretation of FHS authors? Because if not, you are
> clearly preferring your interpretations over a clear statement. Or
> is there something more that I don't see?\
Yes. I said, see the quote. Not the interpretation. If you see the
quote, you can tell us how you interpret it. It might also be a
useful exercise to look at how other distributions interpret it as
well. What does add-on software mean? If you want to get a official
interpretation, talk to whoever is supposedly trying to revise it
now.
Rahul
Yes, I know the quote, it was me who quoted it in the first place. Add-on application
software packages can mean almost anything, which is precisely my point - you interpret it
in a very narrow way, and you are not accepting any comments on it. As for the other
distributions, I thought we want to do something better/different. Other distributions do
not do usrmove and we do, so what is the point in arguing with that?
--
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.