On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 10:07 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Adam Williamson
<awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 12:32 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>
>> Adam's scheme is the only possibility.
>
>> Adam's raid1 /boot just seems more
>> reliable, especially if it became a designed feature.
>
> It's not my plan, it's the anaconda developers'. I only described it.
> Actually it took them like 15 minutes to get it into my dumb brain. :)
Can you all please try to make sure you're talking about the same thing?
I believe that Chris is suggesting /boot as raid1 and ESP not
mounted.
He is also giving feedback on the ESP-as-RAID1 idea. He's both doing
that *and* proposing an alternative, which may be what you're missing. I
don't think anyone but you is confused about the alternative ideas here.
Adam and Przemek seem to be talking about /boot on RAID1 (I've
never
heard anyone say that /boot as RAID is a bad idea) but I think
something's very confused about my understanding of your opinions
about how the ESP should or does work. Can one or both of you please
describe, unambiguously, how you think the ESP should be created, when
and if it should be mounted, what filesystem and/or raid config should
be used to mount it, and what should happen when a kernel is updated?
I thought I already did. Just go back and read my original mail again.
And again, it's nothing about what "I think", I was simply describing a
potential design which had been explained to me by someone else.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net