On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 13:23 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Vít Ondruch
<vondruch(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> What the version of v8 will be? I am asking, since rubygem
> -therubyracer
> is using system version of v8 and I am bit afraid what impact it
> will have.
3.28.73 for nodejs 0.12, 4.2.77.13 for iojs.
Looks like rubygem-therubyracer is still on 3.16. :-(
I don't mind doing a v8-3.14 compat package for a few Fedora
releases,
since I'm still going to be maintaining it in EPEL for the forseeable
future anyway...
> How is Chromium compatible with the updated Node.js (not user of
> Chromium though, neither it is in Fedora AFAIK).
Not at all, nor has it been ever, nor will it be ever. Last time I
checked spot didn't even bother separating v8 from chromium anymore,
it's gotten so bad. :-/
> And since the two questions above, I am not sure it should not be
> system
> wide change (not mentioning all the nodejs- packages which depends
> on
> Node.js).
Well the nodejs-* packages are clearly within our SIG, which the
Change policy says is okay for Self-Contained Change.
The v8 changes do affect two other packages, though. I could adjust
the category of the wiki page, or split out the v8 changes from
io.js/nodejs012 into a v8 systemwide one. But the change deadline
was
yesterday, is this still okay?
I'll indicate to FESCo that we should consider the Node.js update to be
system-wide when we discuss it at the meeting next week. I don't think
it's worth separating into two Change Proposals considering it doesn't
change the work being done, really.
-T.C.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Dne 24.6.2015 v 01:37 Jan Kurik napsal(a):
> > -- Update v8
> >
>
> What the version of v8 will be? I am asking, since rubygem
> -therubyracer
> is using system version of v8 and I am bit afraid what impact it
> will have.
>
> How is Chromium compatible with the updated Node.js (not user of
> Chromium though, neither it is in Fedora AFAIK).
>
> And since the two questions above, I am not sure it should not be
> system
> wide change (not mentioning all the nodejs- packages which depends
> on
> Node.js).
>
>
> Vít
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct