On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 20:51 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:00 +0100
> Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +0000, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> > > Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013
> >
> > DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noarch (build)
> > DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
> > DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl
> > (build)
> > DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libperl.so
> > DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl
> > (build)
> >
> >
> > debconf building is failing because po4a was fail too , isn't it ?
> > and also perl-Qt seems is not in F20 updated .
>
> perl-Qt has test suite failures with Perl 5.18.
>
> See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 for status of the
> Perl 5.18 rebuild.
>
Hi, in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 I see po-debconf,
it depends on po4a and perl-Qt . po4a-0.44-11 was rebuilt successfully
with perl 5.18 , but po-debconf tried to use po4a-0.44-10
In list is missing (at least) debconf,
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=13893
I just check now, also needs perl-Qt-devel
and debhelper builds
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16206
are in wrong order ..., ausil rebuild first than ppisar.
as ausil build fail , shouldn't be resubmitted by ausil ?
Thanks and best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
Sérgio M. B.