On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:52 am, Chris Murphy <lists(a)colorremedies.com>
wrote:
That is the plan, otherwise the swap-on-zram device probably never
gets used. And then its overhead, which is small but not zero, is just
a waste.
I thought the plan was to get rid of the disk-based swap partition,
since it has an unacceptable impact on system responsiveness?