On 02/24/2015 04:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 03:51 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> 2.) Ensure dist upgrades remove old JDK package (which may no longer
>> get security updates).
>
> Firstly, as I understand upgrade isn't supposed to remove packages by
> default, unless they are obsoleted or conflict with something. Are you
> saying that JDKs should be treated exceptionally by package management
> systems?
I should add that user can easily remove packages which were installed
as dependencies, but which are no longer needed by running "yum
autoremove" command.
So by other words - from option "one" and "two" you vote for two, no
renaming, and removing rules
4,5,6,7.
You do not complain about rule 2 and 3.Right?